Native Vote 2026
A federal district judge in Alaska dismissed the Trump administration’s Department of Justice (DOJ) lawsuit United States v. State of Alaska, Case No. 3:26-cv that sought to block certification of Alaska’s Senate election results for the upcoming midterm elections.
On Sunday, Nov. 1, 2026, U.S. District Judge Sharon L. Gleason, an Obama appointee, issued a 20-page decision decision just two days before the general election. The lawsuit centered on incumbent Republican Sen. Dan S. Sullivan and Daniel J. Sullivan, another candidate whose name appears on the same ballot.
The senator’s campaign blames Democrat Mary Peltola (Yup’ik), who is running for the seat held by Sen. Sullivan, her campaign or the Alaska Democratic Party for Dan J. Sullivan entering the race.
The dispute began after Alaska election officials initially rejected Daniel J. Sullivan’s candidacy, citing concerns that his name and campaign activities could confuse voters. Sen. Sullivan challenged that decision in state court, where the Alaska Superior Court overturned the rejection. The Alaska Supreme Court subsequently upheld that ruling, allowing both candidates to appear on the ballot.
During the August primary, incumbent Dan S. Sullivan received 41.40% of the vote, while Daniel J. Sullivan received 2.47%. Both advanced to the November general election.
Sunday’s ruling relied primarily on the constitutional requirement of standing under Article III, particularly the principle of redressability. To bring a case in federal court, a plaintiff must demonstrate that a favorable judicial decision could meaningfully address the alleged injury.
Judge Gleason concluded that the federal government had not shown how its proposed investigation could accomplish that objective. The court also cited the Purcell principle, which cautions federal courts against making significant changes to election procedures immediately before an election because such intervention can create confusion for voters and election administrators.
The lawsuit was dismissed without prejudice, and the judge denied the federal government’s request for another opportunity to amend its complaint.
The ruling did not determine whether voter confusion actually occurred, whether Daniel J. Sullivan’s candidacy was improper, or whether Alaska violated federal election law. Instead, the decision addressed whether the federal government had established a legal basis for the specific intervention it requested.
With the November 3 election approaching, the ruling left Alaska’s existing election procedures in place.
The post Federal Judge Dismisses DOJ Lawsuit Seeking to Block Certification of Alaska Senate Election Results appeared first on Native News Online.
